So far, all the oscillators we've treated are ideal. There is no friction or damping. In the real world, of course, things always damp down. You have to keep pushing the kid on the swing or they slowly come to rest. Your car doesn't keep bouncing after going through a pothole in the road. Buildings and bridges, clocks and kids, real oscillators all have damping.
Damping forces can be very complicated. There is kinetic friction, which tends to be independent of speed. There are various fluid drag forces, which tend to depend on speed, but in a sometimes complicated way. There may be other forces that we haven't studied yet that contribute to damping. So in order to get beyond a very qualitative description of damping, we're going to have to specify a form for the damping force (ideally one we can work with, i.e. integrate).
We'll pick the simplest possible one:
![]() |
(84) |
We proceed with Newton's second law for a mass on a spring with
spring constant
and a damping force
:
![]() |
(85) |
![]() |
(86) |
Again, it looks like a function that is proportional to its own first derivative is called for (and in this case this excludes sine and
cosine as possibilities). We guess
as before,
substitute, cancel out the common
and get the
characteristic:
![]() |
(87) |
To solve for we have to use the dread quadratic formula:
![]() |
(88) |
This isn't quite where we want it. We simplify the first term, factor a
out from under the radical (where it becomes
, where
is the frequency of the undamped
oscillator with the same mass and spring constant) and get:
![]() |
(89) |
![]() |
(90) |
![]() |
(91) |
Again, we can take the real part of their sum and get:
![]() |
(92) |