The input and output impedances we are discussing in the context of
transistor amplifiers are in fact exactly the same as what we were
discussing before. The input impedance is the impedance ``seen'' from
the input. Imagine the circuit as a black box with the input
terminals poking out from it, put a voltage across the
terminals, and measure the current
. You would infer that
the black box has an impedance
: that's
, the input impedance. Similarly, imagine ``looking'' at the
black box from the two output terminals: the ``Thevenin equivalent''
impedance is the open-terminal voltage over the short-circuit-terminal
current, i.e.,
.
Now for impedance matching: that's the idea that when you have power supply impedance and load impedance the same, you get maximum power transfer (worked out in Eggleston 2.9 in the context of transformers). In this context, the power supply Thevenin equivalent resistance is the output impedance of the supply, and the load resistance is the input impedance of the circuit you attach to the supply. The concept actually holds generally for input and output impedances of four-terminal networks you attach to each other- when the input impedance of the second is matched to the output impedance of the first, power transfer is maximum. This is a reason you often want to know input and output impedances. (Also, matched impedances suppress signal reflections, although we haven't really talked much about that.)
...So for the RLC circuit is
?
Well, if you work out input and output impedance for a passive RLC network,
you will find that in general
.
will be
and
will depend on where you are
taking the output.
But indeed, for the RLC circuit also, power transfer from the supply
is maximum when the input impedance of the RLC circuit (which
depends on ) is matched to the output impedance of the power
supply at the input of the RLC circuit.