Parentheses do start to matter for mixed forms, expressions that contain both multiplication/division and addition/subtraction.
Suppose we look at the following equation:
(3.21) |
(3.22) |
(3.23) |
(3.24) |
Parentheses can always be used to make the order of evaluation unambiguous, and if there is any doubt as to what the correct order should be they should be. However, algebracians and computer scientists (who often have to implement ``algebra'' in computer programs) don't want to always have to use them to resolve these conflicts. They (and we) introduce and ordering convention to tell us which operations to do first in an expression that mixes things like taking powers, multiplying and adding.
Starting at the deepest level of parentheses and working recursively outward:
Here's an example of an expression both with and without the (redundant)
parentheses:
(3.25) |
With this rule defined, we can actually shorten our expression still further by adding another convention and still have expressions
be quite unambiguous. From now on, if we put two symbols next to
each other with no sign in between them, they are assumed to be
multiplied with an implicit operator. That is:
(3.26) |